Talk To Pets: Difference between revisions

From Sapphire Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[Sapphire]], a conflict arose when previous Head of Community [[Caleb Duke]] heard [[Mohammad Bhatti]] talking to his cat. Duke argued that people like Bhatti must be insane for talking to animals. Scientific studies show that animals in fact do learn the way you gesture towards them, thus somewhat justifying what the Talk To Pets side of the argument was trying to say. Duke still opposes this movement.
In [[Sapphire]], a conflict arose when [[Caleb]] heard [[Funky]] talking to his cat. He argued that people like Funky  must be insane for talking to animals. Scientific studies show that animals in fact do learn the way you gesture towards them, thus somewhat justifying what the Talk To Pets side of the argument was trying to say. In spite, Caleb still opposes this movement.


== Those who identified with the Talk To Pets side ==
== Those who identified with the Talk To Pets side ==
Line 9: Line 9:


*[[Slar]]
*[[Slar]]
*[[Mike]]

Latest revision as of 10:57, 9 January 2017

In Sapphire, a conflict arose when Caleb heard Funky talking to his cat. He argued that people like Funky must be insane for talking to animals. Scientific studies show that animals in fact do learn the way you gesture towards them, thus somewhat justifying what the Talk To Pets side of the argument was trying to say. In spite, Caleb still opposes this movement.

Those who identified with the Talk To Pets side

Those who identified against the Talk To Pets side