Talk To Pets: Difference between revisions
Created page with "In Sapphire, a conflict arose when previous Head of Community Caleb Duke heard Mohammad Bhatti talking to his cat. Duke argued that people like Bhatti must be insa..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[Sapphire]], a conflict arose when previous Head of Community [[Caleb Duke]] heard [[Mohammad Bhatti]] talking to his cat. Duke argued that people like Bhatti must be insane for talking to animals. Scientific studies show that animals in fact do learn the way you gesture towards them, thus somewhat justifying what the Talk To Pets side of the argument was trying to say. Duke still opposes this movement. | In [[Sapphire]], a conflict arose when previous Head of Community [[Caleb Duke]] heard [[Mohammad Bhatti]] talking to his cat. Duke argued that people like Bhatti must be insane for talking to animals. Scientific studies show that animals in fact do learn the way you gesture towards them, thus somewhat justifying what the Talk To Pets side of the argument was trying to say. Duke still opposes this movement. | ||
== Those who identified with the Talk To Pets side == | |||
*[[Funky]] | |||
*[[Bryan]] | |||
== Those who identified against the Talk To Pets side == | |||
*[[Slar]] | |||
*[[Mike]] | |||
Revision as of 00:09, 2 May 2013
In Sapphire, a conflict arose when previous Head of Community Caleb Duke heard Mohammad Bhatti talking to his cat. Duke argued that people like Bhatti must be insane for talking to animals. Scientific studies show that animals in fact do learn the way you gesture towards them, thus somewhat justifying what the Talk To Pets side of the argument was trying to say. Duke still opposes this movement.